from mars,I used the data from U Col Boulder, which is availabe as aacutl data and not just a graph. It looks like CSIRO smooths their data a lot more. Do you know if CSIRO has aacutl data available?And you did not use Cazenave's method. He used contemporaneous data.The Skeptical Science link I provided seems to indicate that the slr budget can be closed over the entire record with use of ocean temperature data alone. That is also the conclusion of Cazenave for 2003-2008. Why do you feel the need to supplement the period from 2003-2008 with a steric number that's more than the known temperature data provides?And for what it's worth (again using the Colorado data), if you break up the 18 year satellite data into thirds (each encompassing multiple El Ninos and La Ninas), the first third of the record gives 3.1, the second gives 3.6, and the third gives 1.9. Hardly numbers that indicate a consistent rise in sea level.

pL3NaO Muchos Gracias for your article.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

ZxvZ8R very nice put up, i definitely love this website, keep on it